UK high value TV show beats the pandemic

UK high value TV show beats the pandemic

UK high value TV show beats the pandemic

How do you make a high value show that gets a whole nation talking but has logistical challenges of having contestants from across the country in close proximity to each other, to crew and presenters?

That is the challenge that faced Love Productions, makes of the award-winning Great British Bakeoff [GBBO]. This staple of UK television for the past decade, that has the power to clear supermarkets out of ingredients within 24 hours of transmission, regularly attracts audiences of over six million people on the UK’s Channel 4. In an article for the Daily Telegraph, cookery expert and GBBO judge Prue Leith told the story behind this year’s unprecedented production. 

Prue Leith: What really went on inside the Bake Off bubble

Filming the new series of Bake Off was like living in a microcosm of the perfect society, writes the presenter

After months of lockdown, The Great British Bake Off came to life and I found myself in a bubble with 150 other people on the 115-acre Down Hall estate. Confined for seven weeks somewhere near Bishop’s Stortford. No hope of remission. Once you were in you couldn’t leave. If you had to leave, you’d not be allowed back.

It turned out to be one of the most remarkable periods of my long life. But to enter the bubble wasn’t easy. We were all quarantined for nine days beforehand and had to take two Covid-19 tests. My husband had to isolate and be tested too (“gagging orders” he called them) just to drive me there. His car was locked and unused for the nine days, then we drove – no stopping – straight to location.

On arrival I had another Covid test, was issued with masks and sanitiser; then confined to my room until given the all-clear 24 hours later. There were notices everywhere – Keep Your Distance, Wash Your Hands, Sanitise Before Touching Your Glass, One at a Time in the Lift, If You Love Me Don’t Hug Me.

It’s true that most telly people were desperate to be back at work, but it is still remarkable that almost all the long-established Bake Off team signed up to the quarantining and abandoned home and hearth for seven weeks. Everyone has partners or children (in my case grandchildren) to miss. Twenty of the hotel staff and two gardeners had to join the rest of us in the bubble. And the 12 bakers had to leave home, family, friends and their familiar kitchens.

Like a posh boarding school

Down Hall, a spa hotel, usually has a staff of 150. Now they were down to 20, looking after 130 of us, and their elegant rooms were plastered with safety instructions and notices: Crew Lounge, Production Office, Baker’s Dining Room, Talent Lounge”. The spa was closed, and we queued for meals. It felt a bit like a posh boarding school.

The famous tent was on a grassy expanse with a sloping field below, and beyond that woods and a stream. Two hundred yards away was the tent where Paul Hollywood and I discuss the pitfalls of each technical challenge. It’s known as Perfect, Perfect because we chat and drool over the model example of the bake-to-be. Between the two tents were four cute shepherd’s huts for Paul, Matt Lucas (our new judge), Noel Fielding and me, complete with desk, bed and comfy chair. Perfect for a cosy lie-down between takes.

Dotted about were more tents: 12 well-equipped kitchens for the bakers to practise in; tented offices; stores; laundry; green rooms; medical centre; guard room at the gate; cleaning station for sanitising incoming deliveries.

A dozen golf buggies belted along between the tents, moving people or kit, or running errands. Sometimes it felt like a small town, with all the citizens diligently working in the same factory.

Medics were everywhere, checking everyone’s temperature. Security guards patrolled, cleaners cleaned. Covid didn’t stand a chance. It must have been the safest place in England.

I’d never have thought 150 people could be locked up together for nearly seven weeks without a quarrel. Who could imagine we’d get every episode filmed to schedule, that we’d get through without anyone testing positive for Covid, with our location – and indeed the fact that we were filming at all – kept secret until almost the very end.

TV history in the making

Success was largely down to months of meticulous planning. This time, absolutely everyone involved in the show, from wardrobe to electricians, gardeners and chaperones (two of the bakers brought children with them) had to be given bed and board. I do think we made television history. Few people thought it would be possible to make a complicated 10-episode show in lockdown, but Channel 4 and Love Productions were determined, feeling Bake Off would be solace to the nation.

The unspoken fear throughout was that one of us would prove Covid-positive and all that effort would be for naught as the show was abandoned.

The more talked about, but less terrifying danger was that Noel Fielding’s girlfriend, Birdy, would have their new baby early. Then Noel would have to quit, leaving Matt to host the show alone. The pregnant Birdy, with two-year old Dali, was in the bubble with us, but the production company put her – and us all – at ease, going to extraordinary lengths to make sure we would be safe and comfortable. And to have a jolly time on days off: there was football, cricket, rounders, croquet, lots of ping pong, and an ongoing tennis

One balmy evening everyone turned out to play or watch a game of rounders. Sitting on the grass, glass in hand, cheering on the Oldies thrashing the Yoof felt pretty good. Sadly, the young reversed this at the return match a fortnight later.

On sunny days off, the lawns would be dotted with people lounging about on beanbags, reading, playing board games or just dozing in the sun.

In the evenings there were movies on a big screen (beanbags on the floor), and one night we all played bingo, with Matt calling the numbers and Noel winning first prize of a tower of Pot Noodles.  Matt was an instant success with everyone. He has that winning combination of wit and kindness that makes everyone love him. One of the producers, Lucy, put a dozen colleagues through twice-weekly gruelling HIIT classes and another, Becka, ran yoga sessions. There’s something about the holiday camp atmosphere that makes you want to join in, so I ran two flower-arranging workshops.

After a while, restrictions were eased a bit and spouses could join us – provided they went through the nine days of quarantine again. John brought our Cavalier spaniels, Tattie and Teasle, whereupon my daily walk through the woods became compulsory. Two badly trained spaniels and a lot of rabbits is a recipe for disaster. Rabbit poo is their favourite treat and rabbit chasing their favourite sport. Tattie broke two leads.

Bake-Off make-up and wardrobe wagons have always been a gossip centre, with jokes and impromptu singing, and this year, on days off, there might have been the occasional Negroni.

Pre-Covid, I never realised working full-time, keeping house and catching up with friends, family and emails was at all stressful. That was just my life, and I was happy with it. But I had no idea what stress-free really is. I know now. It’s being in a lockdown bubble with a crowd of really nice people, with meals provided, grounds to get lost in, entertainment laid on, working with a bunch of cheerful, can-do, non-complaining colleagues committed to getting the nation’s favourite show on the road, then time off lying on a beanbag in the sun, reading those books that have been piling up by my bedside for years, walking the dogs and FaceTiming my beloved to hear that he really, really misses me.

For some families the tensions of lockdown might accelerate relations into disaster, but many couples, I think, have woken up to how much they love each other, how glorious nature is, how precious time doing what you want to do is. And if you can have the luck we had, to do our work in a bubble, what could be better? The lockdown Bake Off has, I think, turned some long-time acquaintances and work colleagues into friends, and allowed us all to be proper people, not trying to be cool and indifferent. We became what we are at heart – caring, concerned, even loving.

Our bubble became a microcosm of the perfect society with no need to lock a door, with everyone doing their job with energy and commitment, and everyone appreciating the value of others. And I’m sure that, as well as the bakers’ efforts, will be plain to see as the series goes on.

Image: Mark Bourdillon/C4/Love Productions

UN releases podcast with Julia Roberts

UN releases podcast with Julia Roberts

UN releases podcast with Julia Roberts

Project Everyone has released a podcast looking at the world in 2020 on behalf of the United Nations and the Sustainable Development Goals.

Hosted by Julia Roberts and created by the United Nations on its 75th Anniversary, Nations United tells the story of the world as it is, as it was, and as it could be.

It features unique contributions from education advocate Malala Yousafzai, UN Goodwill Ambassadors Don Cheadle and Michelle Yeoh, UNESCO Special Envoy for Peace, Forest Whitaker, actor and women’s rights activist Thandie Newton OBE, UN Secretary-General António Guterres and UN Deputy Secretary-General Amina Mohammed.

Alongside that there are exclusive performances from Burna Boy, and a UN performance from Beyoncé.

The podcast is available for use by broadcasters anywhere in the world, not only for digital platform release but for use in linear broadcasting, too.

http://podfollow.com/nations-united-urgent-solutions-for-urgent-times

WHO collaborates with other UN agencies on pandemic disinformation

WHO collaborates with other UN agencies on pandemic disinformation

WHO collaborates with other UN agencies on pandemic disinformation

Managing the COVID-19 infodemic: Promoting healthy behaviours and mitigating the harm from misinformation and disinformation

Joint statement by WHO, UN, UNICEF, UNDP, UNESCO, UNAIDS, ITU, UN Global Pulse, and IFRC

The Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is the first pandemic in history in which technology and social media are being used on a massive scale to keep people safe, informed, productive and connected. At the same time, the technology we rely on to keep connected and informed is enabling and amplifying an infodemic that continues to undermine the global response and jeopardizes measures to control the pandemic.

An infodemic is an overabundance of information, both online and offline. It includes deliberate attempts to disseminate wrong information to undermine the public health response and advance alternative agendas of groups or individuals. Mis- and disinformation can be harmful to people’s physical and mental health; increase stigmatization; threaten precious health gains; and lead to poor observance of public health measures, thus reducing their effectiveness and endangering countries’ ability to stop the pandemic.

Misinformation costs lives. Without the appropriate trust and correct information, diagnostic tests go unused, immunization campaigns (or campaigns to promote effective vaccines) will not meet their targets, and the virus will continue to thrive.

Furthermore, disinformation is polarizing public debate on topics related to COVID-19; amplifying hate speech; heightening the risk of conflict, violence and human rights violations; and threatening long-terms prospects for advancing democracy, human rights and social cohesion.

In this context, the UN Secretary- General launched the United Nations Communications Response initiative to combat the spread of mis- and disinformation in April 2020. The UN also issued a Guidance Note on Addressing and Countering COVID-19 related Hate Speech (11 May 2020).

At the World Health Assembly in May 2020, WHO Member States passed Resolution WHA73.1 on the COVID-19 response. The Resolution recognizes that managing the infodemic is a critical part of controlling the COVID-19 pandemic: it calls on Member States to provide reliable COVID-19 content, take measures to counter mis- and disinformation and leverage digital technologies across the response. The Resolution also calls on international organizations to address mis- and disinformation in the digital sphere, work to prevent harmful cyber activities undermining the health response and support the provision of science-based data to the public.

The UN system and civil society organizations are using their collective expertise and knowledge to respond to the infodemic. At the same time, as the pandemic continues to create uncertainty and anxiety, there is an urgent need for stronger action to manage the infodemic, and for a coordinated approach among states, multi-lateral organizations, civil society and all other actors who have a clear role and responsibility in combatting mis- and disinformation.

We call on Member States to develop and implement action plans to manage the infodemic by promoting the timely dissemination of accurate information, based on science and evidence, to all communities, and in particular high-risk groups; and preventing the spread, and combating, mis- and disinformation while respecting freedom of expression.

We urge Member States to engage and listen to their communities as they develop their national action plans, and to empower communities to develop solutions and resilience against mis- and disinformation.

We further call on all other stakeholders – including  the media and social media platforms through which mis- and disinformation are disseminated, researchers and technologists who can design and build effective strategies and tools to respond to the infodemic, civil society leaders and influencers – to collaborate with the UN system, with Member States and with each other, and to further strengthen their actions to disseminate accurate information and prevent the spread of  mis- and disinformation.

Image: United States Mission Geneva / CC BY 2.0

F24 launches Running for the White House

F24 launches Running for the White House

F24 launches Running for the White House

On November 3rd 2020, American citizens will elect their new President. The country is currently dealing with racial and social tensions, environmental issues as well all the challenges brought forth by coronavirus, which has already killed more than 200,000 Americans. This election is crucial to determine the future of the United States and it will shape the country’s trajectory for the next four years 

Will Donald Trump be reelected for a second term, or can Joe Biden win the election?   

In “Running for the White House”, every Friday from September 25 2020 at 1600 GMT (1800 Paris time), France 24’s four channels and their correspondents analyse the images in the US that caught the world’s attention, the controversies on the campaign trail and help viewers better understand the stakes behind every move by the President and his challenger. 

In the first episode, hosted by France 24’s special correspondent in Washington Kethevane Gorjestani:  

  • Picture of the week: 20,000 American flags planted in front of the Washington Monument, 1 for every 10 Americans who have died of Covid-19.  
  • Latest controversy: The death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg triggered a fierce political battle on whether a vacant Supreme Court seat should be filled during an election year. 
  • Campaign focus: The Trump campaign went all in on Pennsylvania, with 2 rallies in the state this week. The Keystone state and its 20 electoral votes are shaping up to be the single most important race in this election, with data analysis giving the winner of the state a 90% chance of winning the presidency. 
  • What’s next: Donald Trump and Joe Biden will face off in Cleveland, Ohio on Tuesday, September 29th for the first of three presidential debates. 
France 24 protests use of its footage in Trump campaign ad

France 24 protests use of its footage in Trump campaign ad

France 24 protests use of its footage in Trump campaign ad

According to a report in the Washington Post, France’s international broadcaster France Médias Monde is taking action against the Trump campaign over what it says is the unauthorised use of footage from a report France 24 filmed in Minneapolis in June 2020. France Médias Monde has confirmed the story to the AIB.

Here is the report written by the Post’s Greg Sargent:

new ad launched by President Trump’s campaign in Wisconsin offers viewers a split universe: The first half displays violence, looting, fires and imagery of Joe Biden shrouded in dark, sinister hues. The second half suddenly brightens, as images of a determined Trump appear against the backdrop of an American flag and military helicopter.

That second, brighter half also shows footage of a man, a little girl and several others busily cleaning up the mess created by violence, as a narrator intones that Trump will protect “Wisconsin families” and “communities.”

But now this ad may become a public relations problem for the Trump campaign.

The video images of the man and the girl appear to be owned by a French news organization that is now strongly objecting to the way they were “taken out of their context” in the ad. The news organization is also objecting to the use of the footage without permission, demanding that it be taken down, and threatening legal action if it is not.

What’s more, the man in the ad — who appears during the portion that extols Trump’s great leadership — appears to be a big supporter of Joe Biden and Black Lives Matter, and he is also strongly objecting to his inclusion.

The Trump ad in question shows the footage of the man and the little girl at around the 17-second mark. The effect is to position them as belonging to the part of the ad that depicts Trump’s universe as a kind of “Good Place” — communities and families cleaning up devastation left by the violent anarchists supposedly allied with Biden, who inhabit the “Bad Place” portion of the ad.

That footage appears to come from a news segment aired by France 24 about protests in Minneapolis. The organization told me that after closely examining the ad, they have concluded the footage is indeed theirs.

“France 24 was deeply disturbed when it discovered the unauthorized use in a campaign clip of video images taken from a France 24 report shot during recent protests in Minneapolis,” Marie-Christine Saragosse, the CEO of France Médias Monde, the parent company of France 24, said in a statement sent to me.

“France 24 strongly objects to the unauthorized use of its video images for partisan purposes,” Saragosse continued. “France 24 requests that this footage be immediately removed from the campaign clip and is considering legal action should this request not be promptly met.”

The France 24 segment also shows those people in a somewhat different light than their depiction in Trump’s ad, which simplistically portrays them as belonging to the bright, pro-Trump portion, in contrast to the dark, violent, Dante’s “Inferno”-esque Biden half.

The news segment depicts the complexities of the situation: It features supporters of the protesters lamenting the violence and devastation in Minneapolis, including one woman wearing a mask featuring the “I can’t breathe” logo, a reference to George Floyd’s death under the knee of a White police officer.

France 24 tells me it objects to the simplistic presentation of its footage in the pro-Trump portion of the ad (it appears the ad also reversed the images of the little girl holding a small garbage pail).

“The channel is all the more outraged by the fact that these images were reedited and taken out of their context, thereby harming the journalistic integrity of France 24 reporters and the channel’s intellectual property,” Saragosse’s statement says. A Trump campaign spokesperson didn’t immediately provide a comment.

Meanwhile, the man in the ad is actually identified in the France 24 segment as Patrick Nailon. In it, Nailon was prominently featured wearing a Black Lives Matter T-shirt and said he had driven into Minneapolis to help with the cleanup.

By contrast, the ad used footage of him in a way that makes it borderline impossible to see his Black Lives Matter T-shirt logo.

Nailon, who was tracked down by a Democratic operative, told me he strongly objects to his inclusion in the ad and the black-and-white depiction it offered.

“I definitely feel used,” Nailon told me. “It’s disgusting that I’m a part of it. They even kept from showing my full T-shirt. It was devious.”

Nailon added that the bifurcated depiction was also dishonest. “The devastation was not created by people protesting the death of George Floyd,” he said. “We’ve since learned that there were instigators who showed up.”

Nailon also insisted that the ad dishonestly represented the many people who had come from all around the region to clean up, including many supporters of the protests.

“It mischaracterizes the people who were there that day,” Nailon told me. “As if that somehow had to do with community that Donald Trump inspired in people.”

 

BBC has an ever greater international role, says its Director-General

BBC has an ever greater international role, says its Director-General

BBC has an ever greater international role, says its Director-General

The BBC Director-General, Lord Tony Hall, gave a speech to the virtual Edinburgh International TV Festival on 24 August. He spoke of the role that the Corporation has as an interwoven part of the fabric of UK life, the importance of public service broadcasting and the BBC’s ever more significant international role. Here is the text of his speech.

It’s a pleasure to be speaking to you today, even with all the limitations of Zoom, because I believe the debate you’ll be having – about the role of PSBs – is important, vital and necessary. Our response to Covid-19 has taught us a lot about our role. But so has our response to the killing of George Floyd. There are lessons for us all. You see to my mind media is not only a business, of course it is, but it’s also about our culture – who we are, what makes us tick, what brings us together, what entertains us, what divides us, what inspires us, what shocks us. The stories we tell about who we are. The PSBs are vital to democracy. They inform us. They educate us. And in this country they do that equally for all – whoever you are, wherever you are, rich or poor, old or young – you have access to the best. No pay wall. No subscription – free.

The PSB ecology we have in this country is unique. And it works. I know. I am in the final year as President of the EBU. People outside this country envy what we have. PSBs are under threat everywhere. Of course, we always need to adapt and reform. Yet we are a vital part of any country’s culture – we help define and shape it – just as galleries, museums, theatres do. And of course we are at the heart of the creative economy – one of our huge strengths. Which is why giving voice to talent from wherever it comes is vital to our future. And why diversity and inclusion is so intertwined with the role of public service broadcasting. So a great debate to have – and at the right time.

But first let’s stand back and look at what our audiences think about us.

The tragedy and calamity of the Covid crisis has taught us a lot. In a strange sort of way, it’s been a massive, consultation in real time on what the British public want and expect from great public service broadcasting.

For the BBC, I felt the clarity of our mission came into even sharper focus.

Almost overnight, we reconfigured all our output around the most urgent needs of the nation.

Audiences came to us in their millions – for news and information they could trust, for educational support they could rely on, for world-class content, culture and also for respite from the worries we all, every one of us, was experiencing. Whatever is happening in the world – however ghastly it is – we all need something to make us smile.

And the response…

Well, in March, BBC 94% of the British people used the BBC. And, here’s a key fact, 87% of 16-34s did so. In some weeks, TV viewing was up nearly 50% year on year. TV news hit the highest levels since 2003. There were huge audiences for dramas like Normal People and Killing Eve. But also record ratings for shows that helped us escape the confines of lockdown – like The Repair Shop, Masterchef and (one of my particular favourites) Race Across the World.

During this time, around 24% of all UK video, audio and online time spent by the average adult in a week was with the BBC. Netflix was around 4%.

So what did all this tell us about the role of PSBs in today’s media landscape? And about the role of the BBC in particular? For me, there are two big conclusions.

First, public service values have never been more needed. We’ve been reminded how deeply stitched we are into the fabric of national life.

Second, the BBC – and public service media more widely – can now do more for the UK than ever before. And we’re ready to do more. We’ve reformed and reinvented ourselves for the digital age. There’s much further to go, but we’re already delivering.
And that’s what I want to focus on today.

First, we’ve been reminded how important are those things that bring us all together especially at times of crisis, division and fracture.

We all know, and feel, how the last few years have heightened the sense of polarisation in our society.

Covid has come along and brutally exposed fault lines of deprivation and demography. The killing of George Floyd has left no one in any doubt about the scale and feeling of injustice in our society. And recession may well fan that anger and unfairness still further.

Public service broadcasters – and the BBC in particular – have always been part of the glue that binds our nations and communities together. But the last few months have emphasized that still further.

Despite the lockdown we were all able to commemorate VE Day – or the end of the war in the east just a few days ago. There was no Glastonbury, but we all managed to make our own. We were able to come together across five national radio networks to join the Great British Singalong. April’s Big Night In fundraiser raised £70 million for charities, was backed by the Government, and helped vulnerable people all across the UK.

Our local radio stations in England set up a helpline called Make a Difference, linking those who could offer help with those who needed it. By the end of June over a million people had been in contact and offered or given support.

In April, we pulled out all the stops to support pupils, parents and teachers as schools closed. We produced the biggest educational offer in our history: two hours of original broadcast programming every day; 2,000 hours of curriculum-led daily lessons on Bitesize, with 5 million visitors a week… 5 million!

By the way, we’re talking with the education sector about taking this a stage further working with them on an idea of the ‘open school’ in the tradition of the open university. Think of what we could do pooling all our resources for the benefit of the next generation.

And of course I’ve not mentioned the support we gave to the arts through our Culture in Quarantine programme – an unprecedented collaboration which linked artists, musicians, cultural organisations with audiences in a way that only we can do. We’ll be taking this on into the autumn with even greater ambition. This could change the way the BBC works with the arts fundamentally and forever.

My second point is that our responsibility as the UK’s most trusted news provider has never been clearer and more important. It’s right at the heart of this duty to help bring the nation together.

The forces of disinformation and social media tend to feed on fracture and drive polarisation.

They’re often specifically designed to exploit division for commercial or political gain; to unsettle societies or undermine democracy.

What we do, as a PSB, is a force in the opposite direction. Our goal is to help strengthen society and build bridges by making sure all voices and perspectives are heard.

This is about much more than protecting integrity in news, critical as that is. Impartiality is the keystone of broadcast journalism in this country.

It’s also about helping to protect our democratic integrity, and fostering unity and cohesion.

A few weeks ago, I interviewed Mike Ryan – a highly articulate leader in the WHO. We were talking at a seminar for PSB leaders from across Europe. Why you people are so important, he said, is because even if we have a vaccine tomorrow – up to thirty percent of people, according to polling, would not use it. There is he said another pandemic… that of misinformation.

Today the BBC ranks first with the British public for impartial news, and first for information you can trust – we’re way ahead of the rest.

We also rank first for trust and reliability abroad. In fact, BBC News is now more trusted in the US than all major US news providers.

More and more, in the fake news world, truth is a priceless commodity in our societies.

So let’s not forget that, in the BBC, the UK has a remarkable asset: the pre-eminent provider to the world of facts you can trust.

My third point is that the international reach of the BBC is absolutely crucial to any vision of ‘Global Britain’.

Four years ago, I convinced the then Government – well, George Osborne to be precise – to make its largest-ever increase in investment in the BBC World Service.

That funding – £86 million a year – allowed us to complete the biggest expansion of the World Service since the Second World War.

We now operate in 42 languages. We’ve opened new bureaux with more local journalists on the ground. We’ve got new investigative teams holding power to account around the world.

My goal, when I arrived at the BBC, was to double our global audience to reach 500 million people by 2022 – our centenary year. With two years to go, we are today reaching 468 million people each week… 468 million.

We have plans in place to double that ambition – to reach a global audience of 1 billion people by the end of the decade. But it needs extra investment from government and that bid is with them right now.

No one can do more to carry Britain’s voice and values to the world.

Independent research shows there’s an exceptionally high correlation between places where people are aware of the BBC and places where people think positively about the UK. We even help UK trade.

This could hardly be more important as Britain sets out to forge a new relationship with the world, based on an ambitious vision of ‘Global Britain’.

Success will mean drawing on all our considerable international assets. And that means unleashing the full global potential of the BBC.

And my final point is that Britain in a post-Brexit world must play to its greatest strengths – one of which is the creative industries.

Just as the NHS underpins Britain’s global excellence in research and life sciences, so the BBC – and our unique PSB ecology – underpins the excellence of our creative industries.

This is the sector that, before the crisis hit, was the fastest-growing part of the economy, worth over £100 billion a year. And British creativity is one of our most valuable global exports.

The BBC has long been the single biggest investor in – and platform for – British talent and content.

With creative hubs in every part of the UK, we’re an engine of ideas, risk-taking and ambition that powers the whole of the sector. Every £1 we spend generates £2 for the UK economy. And by the way I know we can do more. As I said at the beginning of the year I believe 70% of the BBC should be based out of London by the end of this charter. And interestingly I think that will be easier and cheaper to achieve in a post-Covid environment.

But there’s one statistic that I think really brings home what our PSB system means for the strength of our creative industries. In 2018, PSBs delivered over 32,000 hours of UK-made original content. The big streamers? 221 hours.

Yes, we need to keep reforming, keep listening and learning about how we can do better. But let’s not forget that PSBs are the magic formula for British success in the global media age. And let’s explore ways to build on their strength, so they can do even more for our economy, for our society, for employment.

So the conditions are there for the BBC to deliver more for audiences, and to be even closer to them. Let’s go back and look at what the data is telling us. It shows we have reached the point where for the first time the decline in audiences to linear channels has been compensated by the uptick in our delivery to audiences online and on demand.

This is a really important moment: history is littered – not just in media, but across many sectors – with companies and organisations that failed to adapt to the digital world. Many great names have fallen. The BBC isn’t one of them. We have made the pivot to a new world. And the BBC is in a great position to continue to thrive in the future.

iPlayer is breaking all records – 4.8 billion requests last year, up 38%. And, for the first time, as I say, growth is making up for the fall in linear TV viewing. The reforms we’ve been making particularly around the length of time content stays on iPlayer, are paying off. We’re the only place you can get that mix of live and on demand. That’s unique – it sets us apart. And BBC Three has played a massive role – growing new talent, delivering some of our best performing programmes, winning Channel of the Year three times.
Now we’re using data to give people a much more personal iPlayer service. 49 million people have now signed in to the BBC – how we use that data to get closer to them, to make them feel the BBC is theirs, really theirs, is going to be crucial.

BBC Sounds now has 3.6 million weekly users. It’s beaten all targets in its first full year – including for younger audiences. As I said at the time, we want to bring the on demand experience to radio and to podcasts – and then to take it global. It was a controversial and hard fought move. But again it’s worked.

And all this means that, far from losing touch with young audiences, we’ve really boosted our performance – reaching as many as 8 out of 10 young people.

We’re all set to compete with the very best in the global digital age.

This has come as result of a real focus on reforming the organisation whilst holding onto the values we believe in. I don’t need to remind you, seven years ago we were an organisation in crisis. It was in the wake of the Savile scandal, there were failings over executive pay-offs, there were fundamental questions hanging over our future.

Today we’re an organisation transformed, inside and out.

We’re leaner and more efficient than ever. Our overheads are at industry-leading levels – just 5% of our total costs, meaning 95% goes on programmes and services.

Seven years ago we had an in house production operation in decline. Today we have BBC Studios – the most-awarded British production company in the UK.

My thanks to my successor Tim Davie, who has led that brand new organisation brilliantly.

We have a first rate partnership with ITV to run BritBox bringing the best of public service programming both globally and now in this country too.

We’re more out of London than ever before. A decade ago, a third of the BBC was based outside the M25. Today it’s half.

In the last few years, We’ve doubled the proportion of programmes produced in Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland. And our new BBC Scotland Channel has been a major success. In its first full year, it’s reaching 1 in 6 people each week.

This matters not only because it means so much to audiences to see their lives and communities represented on screen. But also because, as the national broadcaster, spread across all our nations and regions, who is better placed to support the levelling-up agenda?

Of course, The best case for public service broadcasting is made through the quality, the range and authenticity of the programmes. That’s the way to the hearts and minds of younger audiences or indeed all audiences. When I look at something like Michaela Coel’s extraordinary I May Destroy You – I see much more than an unmissable drama. I see a unique voice and talent given unprecedented creative freedom to speak directly to a generation about issues and experiences that matter right now.

When I watched Once Upon a Time in Iraq I’m seeing not only a documentary about the horror of war told by those who were there – and how brilliant was that – but I’m also seeing a series that pushes the boundary of what the genre does. I’ve seen nothing like it.

When I watched David Olusoga’s outstanding programmes on Empire, on Windrush, on being black and British, I thought that these are programmes with deep public service values at their heart. Helping the country, us all, to wrestle with complex issues of identity and history. That’s what we’re all here to do.

This is what we need to stand for. A duty to take risks. To create a space where artists, performers, writers, directors, journalists – do the work of their lives.

So who we employ and how we employ people matters. You don’t know where the talent of tomorrow will be found. That’s why we have massively upped our game on creative diversity. We’ve prioritised £100 million of our commissioning budget for diverse and inclusive programming. And we’ve introduced a new mandatory 20% diverse-talent target in all new network commissions from next April. It means we’re throwing open the doors of the BBC more widely than ever to diverse stories and diverse storytellers. And we’ve already followed it up by doing the same with £12 million of our commissioning budget across Radio and Music.

But to get the best people we also need the best working environment. And the most inclusive one. Satya Nadella, the boss of Microsoft who I first met when we worked on an education project with them, talked about the culture of Microsoft as being one where people are encouraged to realise their personal passions. I like that. Because I believe diversity of thinking leads to great programmes.

We need to attract people who are different, who have different ideas about what matters, who draw on different experiences, who come from different backgrounds. That for me is THE argument for greater diversity. It’s about creativity – promoting talent to deliver diverse thinking. And that in turn brings about great programmes that make sense of and reflect the world in which we live. And we have got to be better at that than anyone else.

So there is no doubt in my mind that PSBs can do more than ever for the UK in the years ahead.

We have to keep banging the drum for what only we can deliver. The role we can play in helping to find the answer to so many of the biggest issues now facing society. From division and polarisation, to the rise of fake news and disinformation, to our creative and cultural strength, even to helping society safely navigate a path through the Covid crisis.

I was much taken with what Daniel Ek, the founder of Spotify said to me last year. In the next thirty years, he said, only those companies with strong values will survive. That’s why public service broadcasting is so much more than an idea of the past. It’s an idea whose time has well and truly come. More relevant, and more needed, than ever.