Plug pulled on international media conferences

Plug pulled on international media conferences

Plug pulled on international media conferences

UPDATED 9 March 2020

The media industry is a people business and for many years that has meant getting together at key events to meet colleagues, exchange ideas and share experiences. The coronavirus is rapidly putting a stop to this.

High profile events are falling victim to the virus as governments impose restrictions on large-scale gatherings (such as the Swiss did that led to the cancellation of the immense Geneva International Motor Show) and as organisers ask themselves whether bringing large numbers of speakers and delegates from across the world is worth the risk.

Cancellations include the 2020 International Journalism Festival scheduled to take place in the Italian city of Perugia (pictured) in early April, MIPTV in Cannes, scheduled to open on 30 March and the WSIS Forum that was due to open on 5 April in Geneva. The Journalism Festival was due to see 470 speakers gather from across Europe, Africa, North America and Asia. In a statement, the organisers said: “The health and safety of festival speakers, attendees, volunteers, staff, suppliers as well as that of the citizens of Perugia is and must remain our top priority.”

Google and Facebook have also been proactive and cancelled events they had planned, including the Google News Initiative Global Summit and the F8 conference.

We expect to see the cancellation of other events scheduled for March, April and May. The writing’s on the wall for some major trade events as companies pull out of attending to protect their staff from possible contamination. Video equipment supplier AJA has announced that it will no longer attend NAB in Las Vegas in April. Other companies will inevitably follow suit.

The Middle East CABSAT exhibition and conference, scheduled to open in Dubai on 31 March, has also been postponed. The organisers have now said that it will take place between 26 and 28 October 2019. 

ConnectAsia incorporating BroadcastAsia has been postponed from June until 29 September, when it will run until 1 October.

Indian media conclave FICCI-FRAMES has also been postponed from mid-March to an as yet undefined date in the future.

News organisations are starting to restrict travel to conferences and other discretionary trips. CNN issued a memo to staff on 2 March restricting all work travel and limiting events staff to what it describes as “absolutely critical” personnel. According to the New York Times, CNN boss Jeff Zucker has to approve any intercontinental travel by any CNN staffer.

The EBU is cancelling large-scale meetings, such as its Sport Assembly that was due to take place in Malta in mid-March.

The virus presents headaches for media companies large and small. Should news crews be deployed? Can location filming of drama series continue? How can sport coverage continue at large-scale international events? These are challenges that have a real impact on the ability of broadcasters and production companies to operate as normal and serve audiences today and for the rest of 2020.

It is clear that precautions need to be taken to protect staff from infection. Simple steps for anyone in an operational environment can be taken to minimise risk, as we noted in our briefing to AIB Members issued on 2 March. The AIB continues to build a central database of advice that’s being given to staff in a number of large-scale media companies to help ensure that best practice is shared by all AIB Members. Not every organisation has well-resourced occupational health and HR departments, so they welcome practical assistance.

INSI, the International News Safety Institute, has also issued a briefing on coronavirus, available here.

Meanwhile, a glimmer of hope emerges. In February, the Splice Beta conference that brings together journalists, entrepreneurs and others involved in media start-ups in Asia was postponed. Now the organisers have said that it will be going ahead in late September.

 

The AIB shares their optimism that the situation will normalise over the next few months – at the AIB we’re continuing to plan our events for the second half of 2020.

AIB issues Coronavirus advice for Members

AIB issues Coronavirus advice for Members

AIB issues Coronavirus advice for Members

In response to the present Coronavirus crisis, the AIB has issued a briefing paper to its Member companies containing a range of advice.

The briefing paper has been designed to provide practical information that broadcasters and other companies can use to inform their strategies for operational resilience and human resources in the face of the continuing spread of the COVID-19 virus.

We are making the paper available outside the AIB Membership in order to assist the international broadcasting community in ensuring its resilience and to help staff throughout the sector take steps to avoid infection. The paper is online at https://aib.org.uk/Resources/Members/COVID-19/Coronavirus-AIB-briefing-020320.pdf.

theaibs.tv – new look

theaibs.tv – new look

theaibs.tv – new look

Following on from the successful launch of our new website design (https://aib.org.uk/) we have now completed the transformation of our awards website (https://theaibs.tv/). The new awards website has a similar theme to our main website so people can easily see the connection between the Association for International Broadcasting and the AIB awards – the AIBs. We’d welcome feedback on the new look, and do please let us know if a link or a page is not working and we will put this right.

AIB Annual Review 2019 published

AIB Annual Review 2019 published

AIB Annual Review 2019 published

The Association for International Broadcasting has published its review of 2019. The document summarises the key activities that the AIB has undertaken through the year, ranging from work on cyber security to sustainability, media freedom to regulatory, advocacy to research. 

“The AIB’s work is varied and extensive,” commented AIB Chief Executive Simon Spanswick. “Because of our global membership, we tackle issues across the world and support our Members across a wide range of subjects. In 2019, media freedom was a particularly important focus for us and, sadly, it is likely that we will have to continue to fight for media freedom through 2020 and beyond. in addition, the AIB’s day-to-day activities helps our Members across an ever-increasing number of subjects, some of them mission-critical. The Annual Review provides a snapshot of our most visible work. Much more goes on in addition.”

The AIB Annual Review 2019 is available online here.

 

AIB publishes first industry briefing of 2020

AIB publishes first industry briefing of 2020

AIB publishes first industry briefing of 2020

The AIB has published its first global industry briefing of 2020. Reaching more than 27,000 media leaders in over 110 countries, this edition of the industry briefing reports on some of the media freedom work that the AIB is undertaking, as well as the BBC’s newly set out goals for the decade.

To join the subscription list, click here.

With its unrivalled reach, the AIB industry briefing is the ideal platform for key messages to be communicated and brand awareness raised. Talk to Tom Wragg about how you can leverage the AIB’s global reach to help your goals.

Media Freedom and the AIB – a topical example

Media Freedom and the AIB – a topical example

Media Freedom and the AIB – a topical example

One of the AIB’s primary tasks is to support journalists and journalism under threat. This means responding rapidly to issues as they arise, and then continuing to monitor and provide assistance over many months and, in some cases, years as geo-political issues that affect our members play out. We use our global voice and the collective strength of our members to support essential journalism as well as to fight for media freedom.

Iran is a case in point. We are supporting the BBC Persian Service whose staff have endured attacks by the Iranian authorities both inside Iran and abroad. We have now had to widen our support to Iran International who also came under concerted attack in 2019.

The past few weeks have seen increased tension in the country and the wider region following the US killing of Major General Qasem Soleiman, significant protests across Iran against the rise in fuel prices and the shooting down of Ukraine Airlines flight 752. There have been further protests over the killing of Iran’s own citizens by its security services. The Iranian leadership has been unpopular for some time with a sizable part of the Iranian people and has committed atrocities against its own people, such as the indiscriminate shooting of protesters. It has found itself the target of the US President. The authorities in Tehran are struggling to cope with what has been described by some commentators as an existential threat to the country’s current regime.

The response of the authorities has included the intimidation of the country’s domestic media – as totalitarian regimes tend to do in time of crisis – along with attempts to influence the narrative of the media reporting on and to Iran from abroad.

This situation means the AIB needs to shine a spotlight on how our members and journalists on the ground are being affected.

These attacks are not new. In November, at the height of the fuel price protests, the Iranian authorities targeted UK-based Iran International in a repeat of tactics they are using against BBC Persian. Staff at Iran International were hit with asset freezes that affect not only them but their families too. At the same time, the Iran International satellite signal was jammed by Iran as it attempted to silence news and information being broadcast into the country. The AIB responded to these attacks on Iran International and its staff, as it has done with the attacks on BBC Persian and its staff.

At the time of the protests, the Iranian Ministry of Intelligence issued a statement announcing that it considers any cooperation with the “hostile” UK-based Iran International TV as “an act of terror”. The statement added that all the “rioters who acted under Iran International’s command” had been arrested.

In December, an individual was detained in Iran’s Khuzestan province for allegedly sending information to Iran International. The channel, along with other Western broadcasters’ Persian-language services, is not permitted to have its own reporters in the country and relies heavily on reports from citizen journalists in Iran. BBC Monitoring reported that the Mehr news agency said that the unnamed individual was arrested at midnight on 25 December.

The oil-rich province of Khuzestan, which has a large population of ethnic Arabs, experienced some of the worst violence during the unrest. Dozens were killed in the city of Mahshahr as the Counter-terrorism Special Force (NOPO) rounded up the protesters and shot them.

Amnesty International puts the death toll during the November protests in Iran at 304 quoting “reliable sources”, adding that thousands more, including a large number of teenagers, were detained and tortured by security forces. Meanwhile, Reuters estimated the death toll at around 1,500, citing three anonymous officials at the Interior Ministry. Iran dismissed these figures as “not credible” while refusing to produce its own at the direction of the Supreme National Security Council.

Iranian state TV acknowledged the deaths of a number of protesters in Mahshahr, but described them as “armed members of separatist groups”.

The pressure on foreign media increased on 9 January when Hesamodin Ashna, an advisor to President Rouhani, tweeted “The Persian-language media outlets are hereby warned to refrain from engaging in the psychological war related to the Ukrainian aircraft and cooperating with anti-Iranian rebels.

This was a clear threat aimed at journalists outside Iran, and it provided evidence of the Iranian government’s continued campaign against international media outlets. According to Iran Wire, Iranians responded angrily to Ashena’s Tweet, with a satirist’s joke widely shared on Twitter: “Send your plainclothes agents to Twitter to wrap up the protests in two days!”

It was two days after Ashna’s Tweet that the Iranian authorities admitted what Western leaders had said was likely – that it was an Iranian missile that brought down Ukraine Airways 752 shortly after take-off from Tehran airport.

The Iranian authorities now had a dilemma: how best to deal with this uncomfortable situation without compromising on their hardline approach to foreign media and the international community.

Iran’s international English-language TV channel, Press TV, in a report on 13 January headlined: Iran administration denies spreading misinformtion [sic] on plane crash, saying: “The discrepancy between the initial accounts and the subsequent investigations gave rise to a wave of public anger, with some accusing government officials of seeking to cover up the truth.

Speaking at a press conference in Tehran on 13 January, Ali Rabiei, the administration’s spokesman, said, “As a matter of fact, we did not lie. Lying means conscious and deliberate falsification of the truth. Such a thing never took place.””

Admission by Press TV of the “public anger” against the government is unusual. Its coverage of the November protests against the increase in fuel prices placed the blame for much of the unrest firmly at the door of “completely trained” personnel – in other words, people who had been put in place by foreign governments.

There was a further development on 12 January when presenters on Iranian state run IRIB resigned. The Guardian newspaper reported: “At least two presenters working for the Iranian state broadcaster IRIB have announced they have quit their jobs, with a third saying she quit some time ago after having told lies on behalf of the state for 13 years.

“Gelare Jabbari apologised in an Instagram post, writing: “It was very hard for me to believe that our people have been killed. Forgive me that I got to know this late. And forgive me for the 13 years I told you lies.”.

So, what does the confusion at the heart of the Iranian regime mean for Persian-language international media? Attacking foreign media is likely to continue unabated, since pushing the blame for the various crises in Iran helps to deflect blame from the current government. The big question is: will the Iranian people accept the continued misinformation and disinformation that flows from the country’s domestic, state-controlled media, or will they start to seek ever more news and information from international sources? Unrest may grow and protests against the regime may increase in number and frequency. This will, in all likelihood, result in increased pressure on the international foreign media as the Iranian Government tries to maintain power.

For the Iran, the pressure that is being applied by major international broadcasters and other organisations through the United Nations may produce greater results in this changed climate resulting from the shooting down of flight 752. This in itself is good for the staff of Persian-language broadcasters who will see increased international support. Whether this results in a reduction in the targeted attacks on them and their families remains to be seen.

While our members and journalism in general are under attack, the Association for International Broadcasting will continue to work on behalf of those who face the immense challenges in reporting about, and broadcasting to, Iran’s 81 million population. We hope that in the near future we will see positive changes occurring that allow Iran’s citizens to understand the world and their own government more easily and in greater depth.

They deserve media freedom.

Image: UGC/social media via Radio Farda